Skip to content

Running on a Cluster

When local laptop time isn't enough, you can take the same project to a SLURM HPC system. There's no separate configuration to learn — the same lc run command works inside an allocation, just with more hardware to spread across.

The big picture

lc run always dispatches through a Dask cluster. Four branches:

  1. On your laptop → a LocalCluster sized to the machine.
  2. Inside a SLURM allocation → an in-process scheduler bound to the driver's hostname, with one dask worker per allocated node launched via srun.
  3. On a lightcone JupyterHub deployment → create a run-scoped Dask Gateway cluster with the project's worker image, and cull it when the run finishes (see the JupyterHub section below — don't use DASK_SCHEDULER_ADDRESS with a gateway:// address, it cannot be dialled directly).
  4. With DASK_SCHEDULER_ADDRESS set → connect to whatever scheduler you've pointed at.

You don't pick — lc run detects which case applies. The only thing you do differently on a cluster is request the nodes.

Pre-flight: pick the right container runtime

On most HPC sites, docker isn't available on compute nodes. Most SLURM systems (including NERSC Perlmutter) provide podman-hpc. On a login node:

$EDITOR ~/.lightcone/config.yaml
container:
  runtime: podman-hpc

Then build and migrate the images for your project:

cd my-analysis
lc build

lc build runs podman-hpc build and then podman-hpc migrate, which copies the image into the per-node container cache. Compute nodes can read it without registry access.

If your site has only apptainer / singularity, the Lightcone toolchain doesn't ship explicit support for those today — you can run without containers (runtime: none) for the moment, with the caveat that the manifest's container_image field will record what was declared, not what executed. (See lc run for the provenance warning.)

A typical SLURM workflow

1. Get an allocation

salloc -N 4 -t 02:00:00 -C gpu                       # interactive
# or
sbatch run.sbatch                                    # batch

run.sbatch looks like:

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH -N 4
#SBATCH -t 02:00:00
#SBATCH -C gpu

cd $HOME/my-analysis
source .venv/bin/activate
lc run -j 16
#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH -A <your_project>
#SBATCH -q regular
#SBATCH -C gpu
#SBATCH -N 4
#SBATCH -t 04:00:00

cd $SCRATCH/your-analysis

# make `lc` available — pick the line that matches your install:
export PATH=$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH                # uv tool install
# source ~/.conda/envs/your-env-name/bin/activate # conda env

lc run -j 16

2. lc run inside the allocation

Once SLURM_JOB_ID is set in your environment, lc run does the rest:

  • Starts an in-process Dask scheduler bound to the SLURM node hostname.
  • Launches one dask worker per node via srun.
  • Each worker advertises the node's CPU, memory, and GPU resources.
  • Snakemake submits each rule via the Dask executor; rules with per-recipe resources: constraints land on workers that can hold them.

3. Per-recipe resource hints

Add resource hints in your astra.yaml recipe blocks:

outputs:
  - id: heavy_fit
    type: metric
    recipe:
      command: python scripts/fit.py --output {output[0]}
      resources:
        cpus_per_task: 32
        mem_mb: 64000
        gpus_per_task: 1

The Snakemake-via-Dask executor maps these to per-task resource requests, so a rule that needs a GPU only schedules on nodes that advertise one.

Interactive: agent-driven runs

During development you're usually iterating — ask the agent to build something, check the result, adjust the spec, repeat. For that loop you want to run the agent itself from inside a SLURM allocation so that lc run executes on the compute node rather than the login node.

salloc -A <your_project> -q interactive -C gpu --nodes=1 -t 00:30:00
# salloc drops you onto a compute node; from there:
cd /path/to/your-analysis
claude                   # or whichever agent CLI you prefer

Everything the agent triggers (lc run, scripts, etc.) now executes on the allocated node. When you're done iterating and want a hands-off sweep of all universes, submit lc run as a batch job instead (the sbatch template above).

What about login-node-only operations?

Build images, dry-run, look at status — all fine on a login node without an allocation:

lc build                       # build images (uses podman-hpc on login node)
lc status                      # offline; reads only manifests

The actual lc run should happen inside an allocation, since that's where the worker nodes are.

External Dask schedulers

If you have a long-lived Dask cluster (Slurm jobqueue, k8s, etc.) that you'd rather attach to:

export DASK_SCHEDULER_ADDRESS=tcp://my-scheduler:8786
lc run

lc run notices the env var and connects rather than starting its own scheduler. It does not tear the scheduler down on exit.

JupyterHub / Dask Gateway

On a lightcone JupyterHub deployment (where the DASK_GATEWAY__* env vars are ambient in every pod), lc run manages compute exactly like it does on your laptop — you just run it:

cd ~/my-analysis
lc run

Under the hood, each run:

  1. Makes sure the worker image is up to date. The project's Containerfile (plus its dependency files) defines the worker-pod environment. If those files changed since the last build, lc run drives an image build through the hub's build backend into the deployment registry — on GCP hubs that's Cloud Build (git-free: it builds your working tree directly, no commit or push involved), on others the BinderHub service (which commits env changes and pushes so build pods can clone the ref). When the registry already holds the image — the common case — this is a single fast round-trip. Code-only edits never trigger a rebuild: your code reaches the workers through your shared home directory, not the image.
  2. Creates a run-scoped Dask Gateway cluster with that image, scaled adaptively between one worker and --jobs.
  3. Runs the pipeline (same executor, same per-recipe resource hints as everywhere else; failed recipes get their output tail forwarded back to your terminal).
  4. Shuts the cluster down. Nothing to clean up; a crashed run's cluster is reaped by the deployment's idle timeout.

A Gateway scheduler's gateway:// address cannot be used with DASK_SCHEDULER_ADDRESS — on a hub, lc run always manages its own run-scoped cluster. Requires the optional gateway extra: pip install lightcone-cli[gateway] (preinstalled on the hub image).

On BinderHub-backed hubs the project must be reachable by the build pods, so it needs a (public, today) GitHub remote — lc init offers to create and connect one, including GitHub auth via a one-time device code (see the lc init GitHub step). Cloud Build-backed hubs have no such requirement (GitHub remains recommended for backup/collaboration). lc build runs the same ensure-image step explicitly; see lc build for backend details.

Containers on the hub: the pod is the runtime

There is no docker or podman inside a pod — Kubernetes itself is the container runtime (container_runtime: kubernetes, declared by the site, no warning fired). Your recipes run unwrapped inside the worker pod, so the worker image is the project environment:

  • A container: spec naming a registry image is used directly as the cluster's worker image — no build involved.
  • A container: Containerfile spec is built on the hub through the BinderHub service, as described above. repo2docker only recognizes Dockerfile, so lc build maintains a committed Dockerfile → Containerfile symlink at the project root.
  • No container: at all → the deployment's default worker image, which ships the lightcone stack.

For the image to work as a Gateway worker it must contain dask, distributed, dask-gateway, and lightcone-cli at versions matching the hub — the scaffold lc init writes installs lightcone-cli[gateway] at pinned versions for exactly this reason. That one Containerfile then serves every path: built locally it wraps recipes on your laptop; built by the hub it runs them as worker pods.

Manifests record the image the worker pod actually ran (worker_image), so provenance is ground truth, not inference.

NERSC Perlmutter: site-specific notes

Setting up on Perlmutter for the first time?

The Install page has NERSC-specific tabs for Python (uv vs module load python, conda env storage), lightcone-cli, and the agent CLI. Come back here once lc --version works.

Storage: keep Snakemake state on $SCRATCH

DVS silently ignores flock()

$HOME and /global/cfs/ are mounted on compute nodes via DVS, which silently ignores flock(). Snakemake relies on flock for locking, so its .snakemake/ directory and Dask spill files must live on Lustre ($SCRATCH), which honors flock. Otherwise you get intermittent silent rule-rerun loops or hangs.

lc redirects state automatically when it detects Perlmutter, so this usually just works. To pin explicitly at project creation:

lc init your-analysis --scratch '$SCRATCH'   # kept verbatim, expanded at run time

Or, after the fact, edit <project>/.lightcone/lightcone.yaml:

scratch_root: $SCRATCH

12-week purge on $SCRATCH

Perlmutter purges $SCRATCH on a rolling 12-week window. For outputs you need to keep, copy or symlink to /global/cfs/cdirs/<project>/.

Further reading

Troubleshooting

  • dask CLI is not on PATH inside the SLURM allocation. Install lightcone-cli into the venv that your sbatch script activates; dask ships with distributed, which is a transitive dep.
  • Workers never register. Usually means the SLURM node hostnames aren't resolvable from each other; check SLURMD_NODENAME / gethostname() and confirm the workers can reach the scheduler.
  • Image not found on compute nodes. Re-run lc build on the login node — the migrate step is the one that actually publishes the image to the per-node cache.
  • Snakemake locking errors or silent rule-rerun loops on Perlmutter. .snakemake/ ended up on DVS-mounted storage — set scratch_root: $SCRATCH in the project's .lightcone/lightcone.yaml.
  • pip install hangs or times out. Compute nodes have no public internet — always install from a login node.
  • PermissionError reading another user's symlinked results/. Cross-user scratch path without group ACLs — request access from the data owner, or copy the manifests into your own scratch.

For the wiring detail, see engine/dask_cluster in the maintainer docs.